What leaders need to know about AI, mental health and duty of care.

Who’s accountable when employees confide in AI?

What leaders need to know about AI, mental health and duty of care.

42.6% of workers have talked through work stress with an AI chatbot. And as stress rises, employees’ comfort confiding in their manager falls from 26% to 12%, while their comfort confiding in a chatbot rises from 9% to 29%.

AI is instant and it’s there at 3pm or 3am, so the appeal is easy to see. But general-purpose chatbots were never designed for someone in distress, and employees often use them on company accounts. So if something goes wrong, who’s accountable: the AI provider or the employer?

Join Matt Jackson, Chief Growth Officer, and Dr Max Major, Head of Clinical AI at Unmind, to find out.

We’ll cover:

• Who carries the liability, and why it’s now a board-level risk
• Why guardrails alone don’t make AI safe
• How purpose-built mental health AI differs from general-purpose chatbots
• How our clinicians built safeguards into Nova, our AI wellbeing coach

You’ll leave with three questions to take to your board and three tests to put to any AI tool your people use.

Who it’s for: CHROs, HR and People leaders, and anyone accountable for AI decisions across risk, legal or IT.